Proper diagnosis of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTM) is essential to prevent injury at the site during extraction and aftermath surgical complications. OPG (Orthopantomograph) is the most common diagnostic aid followed nowadays. However, since the two dimensional imaging does not provide adequate details for diagnosis, CBCT (Cone-Beam Computed Tomography) is preferred in order to avoid such impediments as it provides higher quality imaging and makes the extraction procedure much easier with its ample detailing for diagnosis.
To compare preoperative radiography with cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and mandibular canal.
A systematic review of the records comparing panaromic radiography with cone-beam computed tomography for the pre-operative assessment of impacted mandibular third molar and its relationship with the mandibular canal was done. A literature review was performed using Medline, Pubmed, Science direct, and Cochrane. Total of 383 articles appeared from various sources; all articles were screened and 15 were related to the research question.
With the 15 articles included in the systematic review as qualitative synthesis, the presence of darkening of roots and interruption of the white line in OPG, as both separate findings and in association with each other are effective in influencing the risk relationship between IMTM and mandibular canal, which further certainly require a 3D evaluation (CBCT) before performing the surgery.
CBCT imaging provides much a promising evaluation in determining the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and mandibular canal which is more useful than OPG imaging before the extraction to elude complications both during and after the procedure.
- 1Santosh P. Impacted mandibular third molars: Review of literature and a proposal of a combined clinical and radiological classification. Ann Med Health Sciences Research. 2015;5(4):229-234.
- 2Spiotto M, Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular Third Molar Impaction: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Classification. J Oral Maxillofac Resear. 2013;4(2):1-12.
- 3Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Bhakdinaronk A, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. Dento maxfacial Radiol. 2009;38(1):11-6.
- 4DeMelo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do EgitoVasconcelos BC, e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J oral maxillofacial surg. 2006;64(7):1030-7.
- 5Tantanapornkul W, Mavin D, Prapaiphittayakun J, Phipatboonyarat N, Julphantong W. Accuracy of panoramic radiograph in assessment of the relationship between mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Open dent J. 2016;10:322-6.
- 6Nakamori K et al. Clinical assessment of the relationship between the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal using panoramic images and computed tomography. J oral maxillofac surg. 2008;66(11):2308-13.
- 7Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J oral maxillofac surg. 2009;38(9):964-71.
- 8Katakam SK, Shankar U, Thakur D, Reddy TP, Hari KR, Janga D. Comparison of orthopantomography and computed tomography image for assessing the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and mandibular canal. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;1(13):6-10.
- 9Neves FS, Souza TC, Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ, Bóscolo FN. Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal. Dent maxillofal radiol. 2012;41(7):553-7.
- 10Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Bronoosh P. Comparison of panoramic radiography with cone beam CT in predicting the relationship of the mandibular third molar roots to the alveolar canal. Imag scienc dent. 2013;43(2):105-9.
- 11Peker I, Sarikir C, Alkurt MT, Zor ZF. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computedtomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars. BMC oral healt. 2014;14(1):71-5.
- 12Saraydar-Baser R et al. Comparison of the diagnostic value of CBCT and Digital Panoramic Radiography with surgical findings to determine the proximity of an impacted third mandibular molar to the inferior alveolar nerve canal. J med life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 3):83.
- 13Peixoto LR, Gonzaga AK, Melo SL, dos AnjosPontual ML, dos AnjosPontual A, de Melo DP. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal. J Cran Maxillofac Surg. 2015;43(5):637-42.
- 14Ghai S, Choudhury S. Role of Panoramic Imaging and Cone Beam CT for Assessment of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Exposure and Subsequent Paresthesia Following Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar. J maxillofac oral surg. 2018;17(2):242-7.
- 15Winstanley KL et al. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone‐beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population. J invest clin dent. 2018:e12323.