BACKGROUND: Gingival recession is the exposure of root surface by an apical shift in the position of the gingiva. It is mainly caused due to the periodontal destruction leading to open interdental spaces and elongated clinical crowns. Miller’s class III and class IV gingival recession are of greater concern to the patients owing to poor aesthetics. But management of these cases may involve more invasive and complex treatment that are time consuming and mostly have a moderate to poor prognosis with an unpredictable outcome.
METHOD: After completion of phase I therapy, an impression of the involved arch is taken using alginate impression material and a cast is made using type IV die stone. A thin acrylic veneer is fabricated and delivered to the patient.
RESULT: Retention of the veneer is ensured through the interproximal undercuts. Gingival veneers eliminate both aesthetic and phonetic problems and the patient satisfaction is immense with no surgical intervention.
CONCLUSION: Gingival veneer could be considered as an alternative resort to severe gingival recessions.
KEYWORDS: Gingival recession, aesthetics, gingival veneer, interdisciplinary approach
- Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Periodontal plastic surgery. In: Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. Delhi: Elsevier health sciences; 2011:14.
- Patil S, Prabhu V, Danane NR. Gingival veneer: Mask the unesthetic. J Ind Soc Periodontol 2011;15(3):284.
- Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134(2):220-5.
- Barzilay I, Irene T. Gingival prostheses - A review. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:74–8.
- Venkat R, Chander GN, Vasantakumar M. Ersatz. Gingiva. J Ind Prosthodont Soc 2008;8(2):126.
- Choudhari P, Pillai A, Zade R, Amirishetty R, Shetty S. Gingival veneer: a novel technique of masking gingival recession. J Clin Diag Res 2015;9(1):ZD12.