Aim: The aim of this literature review is to evaluate the various studies and systemic reviews conducted on maxillary and mandibular implant-supported overdentures. Background: Conventional complete dentures were the common treatment modality for edentulous patients. However, the advent of implant-supported overdentures has replaced conventional dentures as a better standard for rehabilitation. Due to increased patient satisfaction and quality of life, implant-supported overdentures is gaining a wider acceptance than conventional protocols. Review results: Mandibular implant-supported overdentures have a higher success rate than maxillary implant-supported overdentures. Maxillary implant-supported overdentures tend to be a form of “rescue treatment,” than being the first modality of treatment for edentulous patients. Conclusion: To improve the success rate of implant-supported overdentures, careful case selection is an important criteria. Further research needs to be conducted to improve the success for maxillary implant-supported overdentures. Clinical Significance: Implant-supported overdenture have improved the masticatory efficiency and the quality of life of patients. Therefore, this treatment modality should be considered as a primary treatment option for edentulousness in future.
Key words: Review, overdenture, implant, retention, residual ridge resorption, prosthodonitcs.
- Sadowsky S. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: A literature review Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2001;86(5):6.
- E. Emami GH, P. Rompre, P. de Grandmont, J. Fiene. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009;20:12.
- Carlsson G. Implant and root-supported overdentures- a literature review and some data on bone loss in edentulous jaws The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2014;6:8.
- Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(3):195-203.
- Charles J. Goodacre GB, Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, Joseph YK Kan. Clinical Complications with Implants and Implant Prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2003;90(2):121-32.
- Slot W, Raghoebar GM., Vissink A., Huddleston Slater JJ., Meijer HJA. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2010;37:13.
- Cavallaro JS, Jr., Tarnow DP. Unsplinted implants retaining maxillary overdentures with partial palatal coverage: report of 5 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):808-14.
- Narhi TO, Hevinga M, Voorsmit RA, Kalk W. Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(2):259-66.
- Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3(2):129-34.
- Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10(3):303-11.
- V. Rutkunas HM, A. Puriene. Conventional and early loading of two-implant supported mandibular overdentures. A systematic review. . Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal. 2008;10(2):11.
- Schimmel M, Srinivasan M, Herrmann FR, Muller F. Loading protocols for implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous jaw: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:271-86.
- N. Alsabeeha MA, A. Payne. Loading protocols for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2010;12:11.
- Stoumpis C, Kohal RJ. To splint or not to splint oral implants in the implant-supported overdenture therapy? A systematic literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(11):857-69.
- Liddelow G, Henry P. The immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 36-month prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(1):13-21.
- Strassburger C, Kerschbaum T, Heydecke G. Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(4):339-48.
- Dudley J. Maxillary implant overdentures: current controversies Australian Dental Journal. 2013;58:4.
- Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11(3):291-8.
- Chan MF, Narhi TO, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(1):7-15.
- Rodriguez AM, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function. Ann Periodontol. 2000;5(1):101-8.
- Sadowsky S. Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;97(6):9.
- Palmqvist S, Sondell K, Swartz B. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: outcome in planned and emergency cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(2):184-90.
- van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Bossuyt M, De Mars G, Calberson L, Ghyselen J, et al. The rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla by simultaneous placement of autogenous bone grafts and implants: a 10-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 1997;1(3):102-8.
- Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(3):405-14.
- Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, Daelemans P. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6-48 months follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(1):18-22.
- Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi SF, 2nd. Analysis of 356 pterygomaxillary implants in edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(3):398-406.
- Ahlgren F, Storksen K, Tornes K. A study of 25 zygomatic dental implants with 11 to 49 months' follow-up after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(3):421-5.